How to Research a Treatment Nobody Offered You | Strength from the Well

Home › Know Your Body

Watch instead

The short version

Turn your hope into a question you can actually type. Read the boring plain-language source first. Then go see whether anybody has tested it in humans. Twenty honest minutes gets you further than you think. And if what you find is we do not know yet, that is a real answer - it just is not the same sentence as it does not work.

Key points

• Nobody is paying attention to your body full time except you. That is not an insult to your doctor.
• Turn 'will this help me' into something a search box can answer.
• Start with the boring sources. They are boring because somebody checked them.
• Evidence comes in tiers. A mouse study and a big human trial are not the same thing.
• When the research stops early, ask who would have paid for the next step. Usually that is the whole answer.

You heard about something. A friend, a video, somebody in a comment section who sounded like they knew what they were talking about.

So you brought it up at your appointment. You got about eleven seconds of it, and then the conversation moved on to something else.

Here is the thing I had to learn the slow way. Your doctor is not ignoring you. Your doctor has a full waiting room, a few minutes per person, and several hundred conditions to keep straight. Nobody on this earth is paying attention to your body full time except you.

I learned that lesson over years, not one appointment. Diabetes cost me my eyesight for almost six months and eventually both kidneys, and neither of those got fixed because I sat back and waited for someone to bring me the answer. I got a kidney and pancreas transplant because I kept digging, kept asking, and kept showing up with better questions than the last visit.

So you learn to look things up yourself. It is not hard. Nobody ever showed you, that is all.

'Will this help me' is not a searchable question. It is a prayer, and I say that with affection.

What you want is four pieces: this thing, for this condition, in people roughly like me, measured how.

Say you heard something helps knee pain. The searchable version is the name of the treatment, plus knee arthritis, plus adults, plus pain or walking distance.

Write it down before you open a single tab. Otherwise you are not researching, you are wandering.

Before you touch a single study, go read the plain-language background. MedlinePlus. The NIH pages. The ones that look like they were designed in 2009 and never updated.

They are boring on purpose. Boring means somebody careful signed off on it.

Fifteen minutes there and you already know what the condition actually is, what the standard treatments are, and whether the thing you heard about is mainstream, fringe, or genuinely new.

Two places do most of the work. PubMed, which is the public index of published research. And ClinicalTrials.gov, where trials get registered before they run.

Type your question in. Add the words review or meta-analysis if you would like somebody smarter than both of us to have done the summarizing already.

You will not understand all of it. You do not need to. You are looking for one thing: has this ever been tested in humans, and how did it go.

Roughly weakest to strongest, this is the ladder:

• Somebody's testimonial - completely real to them, tells you nothing about you
• A lab dish or a mouse study - this is where everything starts, and that is normal
• A small human study with nothing to compare it against
• A randomized trial, where people got the real thing or a fake one and nobody knew which
• A review that gathers all the decent trials and looks at them together

People say 'that was only tested in mice' like it ends the conversation. It does not. Everything is tested in mice first. That is how it is supposed to work.

The fair question is why so much of it never goes any further, while a whole crowd of ordinary people are out here reporting real changes.

You do not need a conspiracy to explain it. Follow the patent. A full human trial runs into the hundreds of millions of dollars, and the only people with that kind of money need to own the thing at the end. If a compound is cheap, or old, or nobody can hold it exclusively, there is no line of funders waiting to pay for the study.

So it sits there at the bottom of the ladder. Not because it failed. Because nobody paid for the next step.

Which means the honest answer for a lot of this is we do not know yet. That is a completely different sentence from it does not work, and I wish people would quit swapping one for the other.

The abstract is the paragraph at the top. Five questions and you are finished:

• Who was in it - how many people, what age, what condition, anything like me
• How long did it run - six weeks tells you very little about a year
• Compared to what - nothing, a placebo, or the standard treatment
• What did they measure - pain and stairs, or a number on a lab sheet
• Who paid for it

One page. Handwritten is completely fine.

The name of the thing. What you are hoping it does for you. The two best studies you found and who was in them. And your actual question at the bottom, in one sentence.

That page is the whole reason you did any of this.

Do not walk in with a stack of printouts and a tone. I have watched that go badly. I have also done it myself.

Try this instead: I found this and I do not know what to make of it. Can you look at it with me?

That is a completely different room than I read that this works. One invites them in. The other starts an argument nobody can win in the time you have.

And if they still say no, they might be right. Ask them why. Then actually listen to the answer.

If every single source you are reading also happens to sell the thing, stop.

If it is one in the morning and every new tab makes you feel worse than the last one, that is not research anymore. That is fear with a browser open.

Close the laptop. Go to bed. It will all still be there tomorrow, and you will be better at it.

You were given this body. Not a better one, not somebody else's. Learning how it works and what it needs is not arrogance, and it is not a lack of faith in the people caring for you. It is stewardship.

And if you have been made to feel like a nuisance for asking questions, I want you to hear this plainly: you are not a difficult patient. You are a person paying attention.

Pray about it. Then take one step. One search. One page. One question at your next appointment.

When you figure something out, come back and tell the rest of us. That is honestly the best part of this whole thing.

Trust God. Be committed. Stay informed.

The study is behind a paywall. Now what?

Read the abstract, which is always free, and it carries most of what you need. Then check PubMed Central for a free full-text copy, or ask a public librarian - they do this all day and they are delighted when somebody asks.

Is it wrong to look things up before my appointment?

No. It is one of the most respectful things you can do. Walking in with one clear question beats walking in with a vague worry, and it gives your doctor something to actually work with.

What if I find something that contradicts my doctor?

Bring it, gently, as a question. Ask what they make of it. Sometimes they will point out something you missed. Sometimes they will not have seen it. Both of those are useful.

What is a preprint and should I trust it?

It is a study posted before other researchers have reviewed it. Not worthless, not settled either. Read it as an interesting lead, not a conclusion.

A trial is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Does that mean it works?

No. It means somebody registered a plan to study it. That is the starting line, not the finish. Look for whether results were ever posted.

This is the part that actually matters. Real people, honest questions, nobody selling you
anything.

Join The Well →

Chat with someone directly

Or get new posts by email. Three a week,
that's it. Unsubscribe any time.

• PubMed, National Library of Medicine
• ClinicalTrials.gov, National Institutes of Health
• MedlinePlus, National Library of Medicine
• Cochrane Library
• PubMed Central free full-text archive
• NIH Office of Dietary Supplements

• How to Read a Study When You Do Not Have a Science Degree

  You do not need statistics. You need about six questions and fifteen minutes. Here is how to tell whether a study actually says what somebody on the internet claims it says.

• How to Tell When a Health Claim Is Garbage

  Not everything that sounds too good is a lie, and not everything that sounds boring is true. Here is the pattern recognition, so you can stop getting played in both directions.

• What to Do When Your Doctor Says No

  You asked for something and got turned down. Here is how to find out which kind of no you got, what to do about each one, and how to keep your spine without burning the relationship down.